<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kupfer &#8211; Alternative for gnome-do</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foresightlinux.org/package-review/kupfer-alternative-for-gnome-do/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foresightlinux.org/package-review/kupfer-alternative-for-gnome-do/</link>
	<description>Because your desktop should be cool!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 18:16:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ulrik</title>
		<link>http://www.foresightlinux.org/package-review/kupfer-alternative-for-gnome-do/comment-page-1/#comment-1310</link>
		<dc:creator>ulrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 07:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresightlinux.org/?p=308#comment-1310</guid>
		<description>Michael: If you want to talk purpose, why don&#039;t you send an email to the author? Sometimes free software is just about doing what ever you want; that you may copy that is just a bonus for you that you should be happy for. Gnome-Do and kupfer are united by their similarities, for example support of Free software without compromise (By using the GPLv3 license)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael: If you want to talk purpose, why don&#8217;t you send an email to the author? Sometimes free software is just about doing what ever you want; that you may copy that is just a bonus for you that you should be happy for. Gnome-Do and kupfer are united by their similarities, for example support of Free software without compromise (By using the GPLv3 license)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TForsman</title>
		<link>http://www.foresightlinux.org/package-review/kupfer-alternative-for-gnome-do/comment-page-1/#comment-1308</link>
		<dc:creator>TForsman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 08:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresightlinux.org/?p=308#comment-1308</guid>
		<description>Not really, it&#039;s just that Kupfer actually handles some stuff alot better than gnome-do. Specially summon files in computer.

You need to try out gnome-do and kupfer to get a feeling how they separate each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not really, it&#8217;s just that Kupfer actually handles some stuff alot better than gnome-do. Specially summon files in computer.</p>
<p>You need to try out gnome-do and kupfer to get a feeling how they separate each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.foresightlinux.org/package-review/kupfer-alternative-for-gnome-do/comment-page-1/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresightlinux.org/?p=308#comment-203</guid>
		<description>Is this just an attempt to reimpliment a mono program into a less controversial language (ala GNote), or is there some other purpose for this project I am not seeing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this just an attempt to reimpliment a mono program into a less controversial language (ala GNote), or is there some other purpose for this project I am not seeing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
